Doug Ford’s controversial wage-cap legislation dominated unconstitutional

A court docket has struck down Premier Doug Ford’s controversial Invoice 124, which restricted most…

Doug Ford’s controversial wage-cap legislation dominated unconstitutional

A court docket has struck down Premier Doug Ford’s controversial Invoice 124, which restricted most public sector employees in Ontario to annual pay will increase of 1 per cent and has been blamed for an exodus of health-care employees within the pandemic.

A ruling from the Ontario Superior Courtroom of Justice on Tuesday discovered the wage restraint laws — handed as an austerity measure to place the province on the trail to a balanced funds earlier than the emergence of COVID-19 — violated Constitution rights to collective bargaining.

“I declare the act to be void and of no impact,” Justice Markus Koehnen wrote in an 80-page choice hailed by the Ontario Nurses’ Affiliation and different unions as a “hard-fought win.”

“On my view of the proof, Ontario was not dealing with a scenario in 2019 that justified an infringement on Constitution rights,” the justice added.

“In contrast to different circumstances which have upheld wage restraint laws, Invoice 124 units the wage cap at a fee beneath which workers had been acquiring in free collective bargaining negotiations.”

The Ford authorities mentioned it’s “reviewing the choice.”

“Our intention is to enchantment,” added Andrew Kennedy, press secretary to Legal professional Normal Doug Downey. He didn’t point out on what grounds an enchantment could be primarily based.

Unions concerned within the court docket problem of the invoice and opposition events urged the federal government to take the off-ramp supplied within the ruling and never enchantment amid issues such a transfer would worsen the scarcity of health-care employees resulting in longer waits in hospitals which are already swamped.

“It’s disappointing as a result of it is a actual alternative to show a web page,” mentioned Fred Hahn, Ontario president of the Canadian Union of Public Workers representing tens of 1000’s of hospital, health-care and schooling employees.

“Now is just not the time for an enchantment. Now could be the time to maneuver ahead.”

An enchantment could be a “slap within the face to employees,” mentioned JP Hornick, president of the Ontario Public Service Workers Union.

The province’s impartial Monetary Accountability Workplace warned in September that it may value the province as much as $8.4 billion if a court docket struck down the invoice, “assuming retroactive pay will increase” and the top of wage restraints. The controversial legislation was to have saved the federal government $9.7 billion throughout its lifetime, the FAO mentioned in a report in September.

Koehnen mentioned one other listening to can be scheduled to find out the “treatment” following his ruling.

Up to now, interfering with collective bargaining has proved pricey. In 2012, the Liberal authorities handed Invoice 115, freezing the pay of academics and schooling employees. It was discovered to have “considerably interfered” with bargaining and the province has since paid out greater than $212.5 million to trainer and help workers unions.

“Invoice 124 was a direct assault on academics and schooling employees,” Karen Brown, president of the Elementary Lecturers’ Federation of Ontario, mentioned Tuesday.

The court docket ruling was rapidly applauded by unions that launched the court docket problem in opposition to the laws, which exempted male-dominated fields akin to police and firefighting.

“This was an assault on ladies employees of the province,” mentioned Karen Littlewood, president of the Ontario Secondary Faculty Lecturers’ Federation.

Littlewood mentioned the choice, approaching the heels of the federal government’s current rescinding of a legislation that imposed a contract on CUPE college help workers and pre-emptively tried to ban them from placing, reveals the federal government “has been confirmed improper.”

It’s been just a few “unhealthy weeks now” for the federal government, she added.

Unions mentioned they anticipate to return to the bargaining desk to succeed in “respectful and truthful” collective agreements with the federal government and different employers, akin to hospitals and faculty boards.

“Entrance-line nurses deserve the respect and rights that each one Canadians take pleasure in,” mentioned Bernie Robinson, a registered nurse and interim president of the Ontario Nurses’ Affiliation.

“Hopefully this can carry again a few of these health-care employees who … felt so disrespected over this invoice,” added Sharleen Stewart, president of SEIU Healthcare, whose union represents nurses, private help employees and others.

The lawsuit went to court docket this fall. Unions mentioned the legislation violated a piece of the Constitution of Rights and Freedoms that ensures freedom of affiliation.

Opposition events — which had joined unions of their push to have Ford repeal Invoice 124 — mentioned an enchantment would make a foul scenario worse.

“At a time when our health-care system is struggling, this authorities clung to a bit of laws that destroyed a relationship with nurses and front-line health-care employees at a time once we actually wanted them, so the federal government has to do the best factor now,” interim Liberal Chief John Fraser advised the Star.

“Mr. Ford’s wage-capping laws has created staffing crises in key sectors like schooling and well being care,” mentioned interim NDP Chief Peter Tabuns.

“Doug Ford should not waste any extra taxpayer cash combating for this horrible piece of laws,” added Inexperienced Chief Mike Schreiner.

Collective bargaining is protected underneath the Constitution of Rights following a 2007 Supreme Courtroom of Canada ruling. Ontario authorities legal professionals disputed the unions’ place that the laws considerably interferes with collective bargaining.

Invoice 124 impacted about 780,000 workers within the broader public sector together with nurses and academics, and lined any agreements negotiated after it was enacted in 2019.


Conversations are opinions of our readers and are topic to the Code of Conduct. The Star doesn’t endorse these opinions.